Automatic “anything” maybe okay for Grandma’s computer, but software alledging to be a system mechanic should approach every nuance of computer operation as unique and that to be precisely controlled by the operator (by the software). Thus, anything “auto” makes this toolbox, or any toolbox software, objectionable from the get-go.
Despite its reputation, which appears more a historical anecdote than a current reality, sys mech is (was?) a good idea. But it seems its corporate IT left its commonsense at home sleeping when it produced the past few versions.
Something more than sales of updates (which should never be a selling point; if they couldn’t get right with version needing the update why would the updated version be any closer?) has to motivate software developers. Every product has a saturation point; any needless additional modules is not a solution. And not wanted. It is an irritation. Despite its insecurity and lack of logic, the Windows OS works at least marginally without this or any tweaking software.
If I were a developer, the only viable project (and the most rewarding) is building a replacement OS for win10. Microsoft OS, more than any other software, needs replacing not tweaking. ©2017