- This topic has 27 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 7 months, 4 weeks ago by
.
-
Posts
-
[@L.P.G]
Please record the operation process and send it to our support team ([email protected]), and then we can help you solve the problem ASAP. Thanks for your understanding.[@Ursula]
Please try the following solutions:
1. please turn off anti-virus software and firewall(make sure it does not run background )
2. please restart your program or computerIf the above methods don’t work, please contact our support team ([email protected]) and you will receive a response within 24 hours on workdays.
[@Lars]
Does Aiarty Image Enhancer work normally now? If not, please try the following tips:
1. turn off anti-virus software and firewall(make sure it does not run background );
2. install it in your admin account, and run as admin
3. have other internet connection way to have a try
4. restart your program or computer to have a tryIf the above methods don’t work, please contact our support team ([email protected]) and you will receive a response within 24 hours on workdays.
Installed on Win11 Pro, copy and pasted the serial no. No issues.
Tried one jpg with good results. Be aware if you are working on a large file using X2 the whole process takes a while so be patient.Installs, but with an error. Registered OK. Seems to work, but has same error popup. The error windows says
OpenVINOCheck.exe – Entry Point Not Found
The procedure entry point
cicreatecommandqueusWithProperties could not be located
in the dynamic link library C:\Program Files
(x86) Alarty\ImageEnhancer\openvino_intel_gpu_plugin.dilHI,
i had VIDEOPROC CONVERTER VER 5.7.
when i use the “downloader” option i could insert YOUTUBE (for example) URL, and the program could to download it.
from 12/6/2024 i tried to download YOUTUBE URL, using the new VIDEOPROC CONVERTER AI VER 6.4, but everytime i got error:ATTENTION
FAIL TO DOWNLOAD THE FILES BELOW
(here comes the filename)
SOMETHING WRONG WITH THE DOWNLOAD LINE. IT MAY BE THE NETWORK PROBLEM OR THE CHOSEN FORMAT NO LONGER EXISTED ON WEBSITE. PLEASE CHECK AND TRY IT ONE MORE TIME.can someone help me?
thanks.GOOD!~
GOOD!~ 謝謝你
Software installed with no problems. I use it for improving photographs as it cleans ISO noise and sharpens images. It would be great is there is a dedicated option for recovering/improving faces and some generative fill as in Photoshop or Krita.
I was pleasantly surprised – app loads, registration no issue on win10. I had an old photo that had horrible blurring – it cleaned it up to the extent I could see detail better. It was not absolute, but the best I have tried so far. I think this one is a keeper so when the license expires, I think I might be a permanent user.
[@John Stampfel]
Regarding the problem you encountered, please try the following tips:
1. turn off anti-virus software and firewall(make sure it does not run background );
2. install it in your admin account, and run as admin
3. have other internet connection way to have a try
4. restart your program or computer to have a tryIf the above methods don’t work, please contact our support team ([email protected]) and you will receive a response within 24 hours on workdays.
Suggestion, add TIF export – lossless, yet with ZIP compression, makes an equally small file – it’s sad to lose so much detail by saving in lossy PNG or JPG after all the work to regain details.
Suggestion, don’t process until we say to after making our selections for target goals.
Suggestion, auto-save to original folder unless we “save as”.
Suggestion, accept “open with” – it seems not to work, needing to have a file dropped into the program or have the program File > Open on it’s own.
Suggestion, add auto and manual controls for contrast, color and white balance, saturation and vividness, sharpen, defog – don’t make us have to load an image in half a dozen other programs to get total image enhancement, make this do it all.
Suggestion, make it as smart and capable as the free Google Picasa feature set, THEN add AI to make it better.
It definitely can improve some JPG image’s detail on a 1:1 pixel inspection level, but at normal display size on screen, say, 720 pixels across from a 4,896×3,672 pixel original image, not so much noticeable improvement at all for otherwise OK images, perhaps it might improve a blurry photo when seen at a lower than original resolution.
It made an over-JPGed image worse, so it’s not a panacea.
It’s painfully slow and manual, even on a new fast computer with lots of resources.
Yet, I can recommend this as a useful tool, with limits – it takes a long time, so patience is needed, and one picture at a time if you want to see and make changes, overwise use the batch feature and hope for the best, but go away for the night rather than wait to watch it process.
Thanks for letting us test this and give feedback – I look forward to the next version’s improvements.
.
hello
